Not without paying another tax that is.....on top of the tax money you already paid to create these public utility lanes in the first place.
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/S-F-to-charge-operators-of-tech-commuter-buses-5118477.php
We have reached new lows, in the wealth disparity argument, when we go at each others throats for some people being in a nicer bus than us.
Instead of creating wealth we must learn to be better at stealing it from others. Of bringing everyone down to third world poverty in the name of fairness.
Apparently if doctors, engineers, and tech gurus don't commute with homeless people, vagabonds, and the criminally insane......then San Francisco will remain a tale of two cities.
Post edited by Mockery at 1/7/2014 2:54:15 AM
http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/S-F-to-charge-operators-of-tech-commuter-buses-5118477.php
The employee shuttle buses, which are credited with reducing congestion and greenhouse gas emissions, have created a different set of problems.
Fairly or not, the air-conditioned, Wi-Fi-equipped buses and their passengers have become the most tangible symbol in the backlash against the city's tech boom as longtime San Francisco residents and others try to cope with soaring housing prices and commercial rents, which have been blamed for forcing out tenants, artists and nonprofits.
We have reached new lows, in the wealth disparity argument, when we go at each others throats for some people being in a nicer bus than us.
Instead of creating wealth we must learn to be better at stealing it from others. Of bringing everyone down to third world poverty in the name of fairness.
Apparently if doctors, engineers, and tech gurus don't commute with homeless people, vagabonds, and the criminally insane......then San Francisco will remain a tale of two cities.
Post edited by Mockery at 1/7/2014 2:54:15 AM