Ron Paul's racist letters:

wont it get them more votes from the far right?

and the center...they wont be shoooed away over this, what are they thinking?
_____________________________

Originally posted by: Smiling Canadian
.... My point was...with a shit attitude like yours...ie. you know better than everyone else about everything apparently...how did you get through without getting a good ass whipping? I know how your attitude would go over during my time and I just stated what would be done about it. It was a fact of life at the time. ...

He's done.

Can you get SS to show a little nipple for us? I don't mind a small dingy, but the nipple have to be pretty.

This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

_________________
"The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals."
-- Massachusetts Abolitionist, Lysander Spooner

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

_________________
"The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals."
-- Massachusetts Abolitionist, Lysander Spooner

It just further illustrates just how unequivocally fucked this country is and should be.

Even now we have tons of Congress critters trying to pound the drum and wag the dog to move our troops from one unnecessariy war in Iraq to another one in Iran.

But we are worried about some dude who may, or may not, have said something quazi racist some twenty five years ago in a news letter (much like a forum post on here).

Even now we have a fractional reserve system that is actively and openly marginalizing the US Dollar, essentially invoking a tax against every American who can't hedge against that inflation...........destroying any and all chances for them to retire or ever get ahead one iota in their standard of living.

But, hey, what did Ron Paul say about black people and welfare some 25 years ago? I bet it was nasty.....clearly more nasty than letting some banking overlords strip you of your ability to create a sound livelihood for you and your family.

Even now we have an economy that can no longer function without monetized debt, borrowed money, vast and virtually free interest rates.......that gives people who work 40+ hours a week, at a dead end job, the exact same benefits and living essentials as someone who sits at home and lives off the government dole all day.

But, hey, Eric Holder is being asked to step down, not for gross ineptness, or incompetency, but because there is too many mother fucking racists trying to hold a black DOJ man down. Clearly.......clearly........even the White House is racist......even if a black man is in it.

=========================================================

I have realized that there is a reason this country sucks and it is because the people in it suck........they are mindless, petty, and superficial and continue to allow the real people who run this country, who Ron Paul actively rails against, distract you with shiny worthless banter that distracts you from the real problems that are destroying this nation.

The next time all the hard core politaphobes wan't a good giggle........feel free to talk about Herman Cain's adultry, as the EU crashes and burns........talk about Anthony Weiner's, wiener pics, as the countries economy stagnates......and talk about Ron Pauls "allegedly" racist newletter, some quarter century ago, as the stock market continues to steal your 401k, our economy looks like the EU, and everything you have ever held important to you (like your essential rights and liberty) get stolen right out from under you.

Priorities.......priorities.......my friends. And ours is entirely fucked up beyond any and all comprehensible recognition.

Enjoy your totalitarian sponsored cakes and circuses.......as Rome continues to burn down around us..........because I will be at my house learning to play the fiddle.

Originally posted by: Yeltzer
wont it get them more votes from the traditional democrats?

and the center...they wont be shoooed away over this, what are they thinking?

Fixed for historical accuracy.

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

This is the type of mindless, useless, shit that enthralls the primitive mind of the people at Fox News and Snake/Cocy.

Rather than allow myself to be brought down to this level, I would have left the room as well.

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

It amazes me how easily distracted unfocused minds can become.

This is a media equivalent of what we call a forum derailment attempt. Without these stupid letters, than even Snake (a clearly self professed racist) couldn't help but beat on against Ron Paul, the mainstream media has absolutely nothing else to go after this guy about.

They are scared shitless that his ideas are gaining ground and will toss any shiny, worthless, derailment attempt they possibly can to stop his campaign from gaining anymore leeway.

If there is one thing that Fox News and the primarily left wing media all have in common.....it is their outright resentment and hatred of Ron Paul......but what other outcome could we expect from media enterprises being exclusively run by massively pro-big-government conglomerations?

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

What else do you do when you calmly and patiently answer a question that the person then regurgitates right back to you all over again?

Example:

Cocy, answer me one question.......why did Glenn Beck rape and murder a girl back in 1991? And why did you support it?

Originally posted by: Mockery

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

This is the type of mindless, useless, shit that enthralls the primitive mind of the people at Fox News and Snake/Cocy.

Rather than allow myself to be brought down to this level, I would have left the room as well.

Hey kid, I'd never ask a stupid question like that in my life.


What color are your underwear? White or black? Now that is a good question.

Asshole.

Originally posted by: Cocytus

What color are your underwear? White or black? Now that is a good question.

Asshole.

Let me see if I can take any tips from this reporter:

So, you openly admit that you are a homosexual pedophiliac?

Do you think that being a person of this, "incendiary", mindset qualifies you to have a sound judgment/opinion on who should, or should not be, the next President?

Originally posted by: Mockery

Originally posted by: Cocytus

What color are your underwear? White or black? Now that is a good question.

Asshole.

Let me see if I can take any tips from this reporter:

So, you openly admit that you are a homosexual pedophiliac?

Do you think that being a person of this, "incendiary", mindset qualifies you to have a sound judgment/opinion on who should, or should not be, the next President?

Doesn't matter, he's not going to win. It's not because people are asking stupid questions. It's because they don't know how to ask an intelligent question.

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Douche, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

It's a total hitjob. MSM shills doing their hit pieces for the establishment. Nothing to see here.

Post edited by Nathan Bedford Forrest at 12/23/2011 3:10:52 PM

_________________
"The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals."
-- Massachusetts Abolitionist, Lysander Spooner

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

why? ill tell you why:

he answered the question when it was asked, what more could have done/said?

are you married? a partner? it's exactly like that with reporters...you answer the question, they dont like the answer and ask again and again and again.

at that point you can answer it over and over and over, it never ends....except he has his answer recorded in video and audio, so he feels he has done his part, walk away, leaving the answer for all to review and review and review.

it comes a point when my wife just asks me shit and I just say 'im not gonna even bother cuz u wont like my answer and then spend the rest of the week bugging the shit out of me just so I give you the answer you like, you already know my answer" at which points she goes right at it, saying my answer herself and asking for explanations and justifications over it...

wait...is this the Ron Paul racist letter's thread? righhht...please dont let my wife see the paragraph above, I am tired.
Post edited by Yeltzer at 12/23/2011 3:06:15 PM

_____________________________

Originally posted by: Smiling Canadian
.... My point was...with a shit attitude like yours...ie. you know better than everyone else about everything apparently...how did you get through without getting a good ass whipping? I know how your attitude would go over during my time and I just stated what would be done about it. It was a fact of life at the time. ...

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Wolf, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

Let me ask you a stupid question.

Why the fuck would Ron walk into CNN to do an interview? Is he stupid or naive?

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Wolf, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

Let me ask you a stupid question.

Why the fuck would Ron walk into CNN to do an interview? Is he stupid or naive?

Because he's running for President. Duh.

_________________
"The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals."
-- Massachusetts Abolitionist, Lysander Spooner

Originally posted by: Yeltzer

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

why? ill tell you why:

he answered the question when it was asked, what more could have done/said?

are you married? a partner? it's exactly like that with reporters...you answer the question, they dont like the answer and ask again and again and again.

at that point you can answer it over and over and over, it never ends....except he has his answer recorded in video and audio, so he feels he has done his part, walk away, leaving the answer for all to review and review and review.

it comes a point when my wife just asks me shit and I just say 'im not gonna even bother cuz u wont like my answer and then spend the rest of the week bugging the shit out of me just so I give you the answer you like, you already know my answer" at which points she goes right at it, saying my answer herself and asking for explanations and justifications over it...

wait...is this the Ron Paul racist letter's thread? righhht...please dont let my wife see the paragraph above, I am tired.

There are two different interviews. The Fox interview that Mockery posted is probably what you are referring too. Martha is a dip shit and tried to get Paul to answer what is clearly troll food.

The second interview in which I'm referring too was with CNN. Some woman asked him about some racist newsletter and he walked out of the interview. I'm not sure what the newsletter said or what Paul's connection is too it.

My question is quite simple if this is something that can be easily brushed aside. Walking out of an interview was childish. Why even go to CNN to discuss anything?

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Wolf, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

Let me ask you a stupid question.

Why the fuck would Ron walk into CNN to do an interview? Is he stupid or naive?

Because he's running for President. Duh.

I remember when he wasn't getting any time, now that he is getting time he is walking out of interviews.

Answer the fucking question and move on to the next one. What a fucking baby!

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Wolf, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

Let me ask you a stupid question.

Why the fuck would Ron walk into CNN to do an interview? Is he stupid or naive?

Because he's running for President. Duh.

I remember when he wasn't getting any time, now that he is getting time he is walking out of interviews.

Answer the fucking question and move on to the next one. What a fucking baby!

It's been answered, dumbfuck! He answered it several times for several outlets, including CNN. He even mentions in that video that he's already answered the question and that they should take his response and be done with it.



CNN, in the video you linked to, even acknowledges that Paul has already answered the question directly to Douche Blitzer in the past.

Post edited by Nathan Bedford Forrest at 12/23/2011 3:22:15 PM

_________________
"The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals."
-- Massachusetts Abolitionist, Lysander Spooner

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Wolf, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

Let me ask you a stupid question.

Why the fuck would Ron walk into CNN to do an interview? Is he stupid or naive?

Because he's running for President. Duh.

I remember when he wasn't getting any time, now that he is getting time he is walking out of interviews.

Answer the fucking question and move on to the next one. What a fucking baby!

It's been answered, dumbfuck! He answered it several times for several outlets, including CNN. He even mentions in that video that he's already answered the question and that they should take his response and be done with it.



CNN, in the video you linked to, even acknowledges that Paul has already answered the question directly to Douche Blitzer in the past.

Maybe instead of walking out of the interview he should have reminded CNN that he discussed the newsletter with them already and that they should get the answer from their archive.

I believe what he says in the video, I just have a problem when someone runs away from a simple question that has already clearly been resolved.

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Mockery

Originally posted by: Cocytus

What color are your underwear? White or black? Now that is a good question.

Asshole.

Let me see if I can take any tips from this reporter:

So, you openly admit that you are a homosexual pedophiliac?

Do you think that being a person of this, "incendiary", mindset qualifies you to have a sound judgment/opinion on who should, or should not be, the next President?

Doesn't matter, he's not going to win. It's not because people are asking stupid questions. It's because they don't know how to ask an intelligent question.

Is that your professional opinion, as a self professed homosexual pedophile?

BTW....You are killing my ability to use circular arguments when you won't take my blatant flame bait.

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Wolf, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

Let me ask you a stupid question.

Why the fuck would Ron walk into CNN to do an interview? Is he stupid or naive?

Because he's running for President. Duh.

I remember when he wasn't getting any time, now that he is getting time he is walking out of interviews.

Answer the fucking question and move on to the next one. What a fucking baby!

It's been answered, dumbfuck! He answered it several times for several outlets, including CNN. He even mentions in that video that he's already answered the question and that they should take his response and be done with it.



CNN, in the video you linked to, even acknowledges that Paul has already answered the question directly to Douche Blitzer in the past.

Maybe instead of walking out of the interview he should have reminded CNN that he discussed the newsletter with them already and that they should get the answer from their archive.

I believe what he says in the video, I just have a problem when someone runs away from a simple question that has already clearly been resolved.

So, are you or are you not acknowledging that CNN pursued this topic, knowing that it had already been addressed an answered several times, including on their own network, solely to stir up political controversy?

And I do agree that it was not politically tact for him to walk off, but I sure as shit can't blame him.

Post edited by Nathan Bedford Forrest at 12/23/2011 3:34:23 PM

_________________
"The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals."
-- Massachusetts Abolitionist, Lysander Spooner

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Douche, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

It's a total hitjob. MSM shills doing their hit pieces for the establishment. Nothing to see here.

Dude, Gloria's husband works for the Tate institute, or whatever the hell it is called.

It's a DC run think tank that openly and actively promotes the industrialized military machine in Washington.

It's about as honestly driven as this shit was:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6xWGvdRQ9Q

Originally posted by: Mockery

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Douche, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

It's a total hitjob. MSM shills doing their hit pieces for the establishment. Nothing to see here.

Dude, Gloria's husband works for the Tate institute, or whatever the hell it is called.

It's a DC run think tank that openly and actively promotes the industrialized military machine in Washington.

It's about as honestly driven as this shit was:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y6xWGvdRQ9Q

That first guy doesn't know shit about Lincoln, apparently.

_________________
"The principle, on which the war was waged by the North, was simply this: That men may rightfully be compelled to submit to, and support, a government that they do not want; and that resistance, on their part, makes them traitors and criminals."
-- Massachusetts Abolitionist, Lysander Spooner

Originally posted by: Cocytus


I remember when he wasn't getting any time, now that he is getting time he is walking out of interviews.

Answer the fucking question and move on to the next one. What a fucking baby!

The Daily Show
Get More: Daily Show Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,The Daily Show on Facebook

The CNN audience has a legitimate case of wanting to know the circumstances around the topic, imho. I've never seen him respond to it before I heard a clip on Hannity's radio show this past week. So discussing it with him isn't uncalled for.

Its a legitimate question to ask and they sure and fuck are going to bring it up if he gets the nod. And now he's given it some traction. Part of the job is answering the same bullshit over and over again. If he's going to fold this easily, I guess its good to know now.

And BTW, our Grande Corrupt Mayors of Detroit love throwing the "that's been answered already, let's move on" card, too. Not really a fan of that response.


Post edited by Stryk at 12/23/2011 3:41:38 PM

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Maybe instead of walking out of the interview he should have reminded CNN that he discussed the newsletter with them already and that they should get the answer from their archive.

I believe what he says in the video, I just have a problem when someone runs away from a simple question that has already clearly been resolved.

I thought he said exactly that...........

He clearly said I already went over this yesterday with you guys.

Like I said.......his answers isn't what they are after. It's the circular statements of saying his name and racist letters.

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Nathan Bedford Forrest
This came up in 07. It's pretty clear that he didn't write them and he doesn't condone them. It's a total non-issue that the establishment are trying to use to stop Paul because they absolutely fear him.

Why did he walk out of the CNN interview? Does he think he's above simple questions? If it's a non-story deal with it now.

What are you referring to?

I'm referring to the news story that CNN asked him about something in his past and he walked out of the interview.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/ron-paul-2012-goper-walks-cnn-interview-racist-newsletters-article-1.995353

Ok, this is clearly set up as a hit piece. Douche Blitzer starts off by saying to the woman on screen "Gloria, today you had a chance to press him and see if he was aware of some of those very controversial issues like race."

To see if he was aware? What kind of premise is that? Of course he was aware of it. This shit was brought up in 07...

Shit, the very first thing she says is "Wolf, I know you've asked him about these newsletters..."

That's only 26 seconds into this video.

Let me ask you a stupid question.

Why the fuck would Ron walk into CNN to do an interview? Is he stupid or naive?

Because he's running for President. Duh.

I remember when he wasn't getting any time, now that he is getting time he is walking out of interviews.

Answer the fucking question and move on to the next one. What a fucking baby!

It's been answered, dumbfuck! He answered it several times for several outlets, including CNN. He even mentions in that video that he's already answered the question and that they should take his response and be done with it.



CNN, in the video you linked to, even acknowledges that Paul has already answered the question directly to Douche Blitzer in the past.

Maybe instead of walking out of the interview he should have reminded CNN that he discussed the newsletter with them already and that they should get the answer from their archive.

I believe what he says in the video, I just have a problem when someone runs away from a simple question that has already clearly been resolved.

So, are you or are you not acknowledging that CNN pursued this topic, knowing that it had already been addressed an answered several times, including on their own network, solely to stir up political controversy?

And I do agree that it was not politically tact for him to walk off, but I sure as shit can't blame him.

Yes, it was pursued and answered very well in my opinion. It was definitely a smear tactic by CNN. Sometimes we have to throw our hands up and say fuck it all. Maybe it will work out in the end because he will be asked again and that will be his chance to say once again that he believes in people like Dr. King. In my opinion, there is no better modern day intellectual to believe in when it comes to social policy.

Originally posted by: Mockery

Originally posted by: Cocytus

Originally posted by: Mockery

Originally posted by: Cocytus

What color are your underwear? White or black? Now that is a good question.

Asshole.

Let me see if I can take any tips from this reporter:

So, you openly admit that you are a homosexual pedophiliac?

Do you think that being a person of this, "incendiary", mindset qualifies you to have a sound judgment/opinion on who should, or should not be, the next President?

Doesn't matter, he's not going to win. It's not because people are asking stupid questions. It's because they don't know how to ask an intelligent question.

Is that your professional opinion, as a self professed homosexual pedophile?

BTW....You are killing my ability to use circular arguments when you won't take my blatant flame bait.

Yes and Yes

Originally posted by: Cocytus

...Answer the fucking question and move on to the next one. What a fucking baby!

wait...you dont like it when people dont answer valid questions?

Paul has every right to stand up and leave the CNN interview because he has explained this question 100's of times in the past.

however, as a politician facing our lame stream media, wtf does he expect? actual journalism? hard hitting questions about situations facing this country that all the lame steam media outlets parent companies wreak massive corporate benefits from?

i could easily find all of Stryks threads/posts about this if i wanted too but, its already been played to death. in fact, i remember some threads about Paul accepting donations from member from stormfront and that caused a huge shitstorm in the politically stupid.

and this is why he left.

Originally posted by: Stryk
The CNN audience has a legitimate case of wanting to know the circumstances around the topic, imho. I've never seen him respond to it before I heard a clip on Hannity's radio show this past week. So discussing it with him isn't uncalled for.

Its a legitimate question to ask and they sure and fuck are going to bring it up if he gets the nod. And now he's given it some traction. Part of the job is answering the same bullshit over and over again. If he's going to fold this easily, I guess its good to know now.

And BTW, our Grande Corrupt Mayors of Detroit love throwing the "that's been answered already, let's move on" card, too. Not really a fan of that response.

What exactly do you do when someone asks you a question........you thoroughly answer it.......and then they ask it again, in exactly the same way, the very next day, all over again?

Remember a few months ago when Cobalt used to say funny shit like, "why did Glenn Beck Rape And Murder A Young Girl In 1990?"

It's exactly the same type of argument.......and good god it is successful at derailing any conversation.

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/glenn-beck-rape-murder-hoax

To this day people still think Glenn Beck raped and killed a girl in 1990 and nobody can truly prove otherwise.

Circularly using the evidence of absence is the absolutely best distraction technique in modern history and it works exceptionally great on a mindless populace, with ADHD, that already gets distracted by superficial, irrelevant, and petty arguments.

Originally posted by: Mockery

Originally posted by: Stryk
The CNN audience has a legitimate case of wanting to know the circumstances around the topic, imho. I've never seen him respond to it before I heard a clip on Hannity's radio show this past week. So discussing it with him isn't uncalled for.

Its a legitimate question to ask and they sure and fuck are going to bring it up if he gets the nod. And now he's given it some traction. Part of the job is answering the same bullshit over and over again. If he's going to fold this easily, I guess its good to know now.

And BTW, our Grande Corrupt Mayors of Detroit love throwing the "that's been answered already, let's move on" card, too. Not really a fan of that response.

What exactly do you do when someone asks you a question........you thoroughly answer it.......and then they ask it again, in exactly the same way, the very next day, all over again?

Remember a few months ago when Cobalt used to say funny shit like, "why did Glenn Beck Rape And Murder A Young Girl In 1990?"

It's exactly the same type of argument.......and good god it is successful at derailing any conversation.

http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/glenn-beck-rape-murder-hoax

To this day people still think Glenn Beck raped and killed a girl in 1990 and nobody can truly prove otherwise.

Circularly using the evidence of absence is the absolutely best distraction technique in modern history and it works exceptionally great on a mindless populace, with ADHD, that already gets distracted by superficial, irrelevant, and petty arguments.

I've seen the topic raised and raised it myself. But I have never seen him asked directly and answer in person. There's a desire to hear it from their own mouth (body language even better) from a person who you are being asked to take their word for not being at fault.

And his response to Hannity was that he didn't know what was going on? He lent his name to something that was happening without his knowledge? Even if that what true, he came off as acting he has no accountability to lending his name to those articles.

And do you think that Paul isn't going to get hammered about it when running against Obama? Over and Over. Storming off was cherry for the media. His campaign just took a massive shit all over itself.

Now that Paul could actually become the frontrunner, he isn't the 'republican throwing bombs at other republicans' darling of the media anymore.
Post edited by Stryk at 12/23/2011 9:14:07 PM

I'm lazy and or dumb.......but this is all I can find for finding the full version of these "controversial" and "incendiary" newsletters in question.......

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/us-election/8976403/US-Election-2012-Ron-Paul-under-fire-for-racist-newsletters.html

Just read all eight pages and I'd argue the upsetting part for me is everything they aren't talking about......the removal of our rights........the one world government......the Barney Frank, HUD, FHA shit.....and the authoritarian take over by our new banking/investment banker overlords.

Not the racial shit......but, again, my life doesn't revolve around what color/sex/gender/creed someone was born into. It more revolves around what happens to us and what we are subjected to long after we are born that truly matters IMO.

On a scale of 1 to 10......Snake would get an eight for his typical racist banter and Ron Paul's racism in that letter was about a two/three..... for being mildly insensitive and not entirely PC (oh my).........but the rest of his content was pretty damn spot on IMO.

Perhaps I'm desensitized.....but I've honestly never a single South Park or Tosh.O episodes that weren't ten times more controversial.
Post edited by Mockery at 12/23/2011 9:20:35 PM

I like how you guys are willing to pretend a decade of racist publications with the title "Ron Paul Survival Reports," written in the first person, and signed Congressman Ron Paul, aren't a political problem because you happen to like his politics. He's either the most incompetent man alive or he wrote them. What am I missing?

Originally posted by: Stryk
I've seen the topic raised and raised it myself. But I have never seen him asked directly and answer in person. There's a desire to hear it from their own mouth (body language even better) from a person who you are being asked to take their word for not being at fault.

And his response to Hannity was that he didn't know what was going on? He lent his name to something that was happening without his knowledge? Even if that what true, he came off as acting he has no accountability to lending his name to those articles.

And do you think that Paul isn't going to get hammered about it when running against Obama? Over and Over. Storming off was cherry for the media. His campaign just took a massive shit all over itself.

Now that Paul could actually become the frontrunner, he isn't the 'republican throwing bombs at other republicans' darling of the media anymore.

No doubt........he is going to have to get used to this level of mindless mud slinging. To be in politics, in this country, this day and age, you have to get used to fighting over the most irrelevant and nastiest issues imaginable.

Seeing as how we already have president who essentially got elected primarily because of his race (because it felt good)......this may be the only subjects that anyone ever hears about the rest of this Presidential campaign.

So he better get used to it is right........it's all this country really cares about. It cares about sexual affairs, gays, race, and social issues (be it the right who hates everything.....or the left who excessively favorites them).

Both parties have clearly illustrated that they don't give two shits about actual policy decisions......macroeconomics......solvency.....or sustainability.

So it's good we can all have a "black" and/or "Christian" captain as this countries boat continues to plunge squarely into yet another economic iceberg and begin to descend into yet another Euroesque style abyss.

Either way, we will have the prettiest boat in the free world.....sure it won't float.......but it sure will be spit polished.
Post edited by Mockery at 12/23/2011 9:42:21 PM

Originally posted by: the wierdo
I like how you guys are willing to pretend a decade of racist publications with the title "Ron Paul Survival Reports," written in the first person, and signed Congressman Ron Paul, aren't a political problem because you happen to like his politics. He's either the most incompetent man alive or he wrote them. What am I missing?

I know what I'm missing and it is the actual context of these letters.......

Not that I don't trust the media, but I need to read things for myself. I just read several of them and honestly don't see the controversy.

Personally, I'd rather vote for someone who is mildly racist, but entirely competent in subjects that matter.

Then someone who isn't racist......or anti-racist (only appointing gays and minorities).......who is completely inept at foreign policy and economics.

Personally, I'd rather vote for someone who is a Southern Baptist, who personally hates Roe V. Wade, and perhaps Civil Rights, but has fully supports and upholds the US Constitution and American Civil Liberties.

Then someone who loved the Civil Rights movement, but undermines our first and second Amendment Rights at every cost, and clearly loathes American Civil Liberties.

But that's just my two cents.....as someone who isn't a racist, nor the least bit religious.

I have no idea what Ron Paul did and didn't say, or his intent behind what he allegedly said, but I'd be willing to read them over for myself if they are really that big of a deal.

And according to the media.......it might be the only important thing he has ever written.

So I'll certainly entertain the notion that it matters.

Originally posted by: Cocytus


Maybe instead of walking out of the interview he should have reminded CNN that he discussed the newsletter with them already and that they should get the answer from their archive.

I believe what he says in the video, I just have a problem when someone runs away from a simple question that has already clearly been resolved.

I have a problem with people that continue to feed the trolls of CNN. If these 'reporters' of CNN, FOX, etc., were posting on the forum we'd all call them out for trolling and be done with it. I don't see him as 'running' away, so much as just being done with the issue. If they want to be a broken record on repeat ever 10 minutes, let them. But why should he or anyone else be forced to continue to entertain them?

And do you really think your suggestion of referencing the archive would have shut them up? No, they would have followed up with something along the lines of 'why are you dodging this issue?' It's a fucking circus and I find it laughable, naive that anyone would think otherwise.