At the last three GOP presidential debates, the crowd has cheered for executions, screamed out that a man without health insurance should be left to die and booed a gay soldier.
Dartmouth is trying to keep Tuesday nights Washington Post/Bloomberg debate from continuing that pattern.
In an editorial Friday, the student newspaper warned debate spectators about the embarrassing incidents of audience misbehavior at the last three debates and urged those attending to keep quiet while the TV lights are on.
It would be an enormous black eye for the college and a damning indictment of our maturity and political culture if Dartmouths debate were to be characterized by another inappropriate outburst, no matter its ideological origin, the paper wrote.
Organizers are hoping that a smaller, more controlled audience will achieve that goal.
..more
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1011/65643.html
Note: Dartmouth's newspaper said they [the school] wouldnt
tolerate interference. So, do you think this was done by the school, or the campaigns on purpose? The first "comment" makes that accusation, despite not being stated in the article.
BG: You've been the DA lately, whats your take on this? Partisan antics?