Back to General

Senate to Bush - Nobody supports your veto

Historical capture recovered from the Wayback Machine · captured 2007-11-09 · 1 of 2 pages survived · 21 posts
This thread had 2 pages; 1 page was never captured by the Wayback Machine — some replies are missing.

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Senate on Thursday handed President Bush his first veto override -- authorizing $23 billion in new water projects.

The Senate voted to pass the bill 79-14, despite the president's objections.

Supporters said the projects authorized under the Water Resources Development Act are necessary to rebuild the Gulf Coast after the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, restore the Everglades and Great Lakes fisheries and build flood-control projects nationwide.
...
No senator spoke in favor of sustaining Bush's veto during Wednesday afternoon's debate. The bill has had overwhelming support on both sides of the aisle, said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-Louisiana.

"I don't know why the president chose this bill to try to reassume the mantle of fiscal responsibility, but he picked the wrong bill," she said.

The measure will fund projects including the reconstruction of levees around New Orleans, Louisiana, and the closure of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet -- a man-made channel blamed for funneling Katrina's storm surge into the city's Lower 9th Ward and neighboring St. Bernard Parish.
...
"Frankly, without it, our long-term recovery is really in jeopardy," she said.

In his veto message, Bush complained that Congress added about $8 billion in projects to the bill in conference committee after each house had passed its own version.

"American taxpayers should not be asked to support a pork-barrel system of federal authorization and funding where a project's merit is an afterthought," he said.

But supporters say the projects are necessary because Congress has gone more than seven years since its last major water resources bill passed.

Since the 2006 elections, Bush has vetoed three spending bills -- the water bill, a $35 billion expansion of the state-run, federally funded Children's Health Insurance Program and a $120 billion war-spending bill that would have called for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq in 2008.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/08/congress.water/index.html

It seems to me that Bush is trying to stone-wall congress, attempting to limit their power of the purse at the most inappropriate times.

Seems like he is a rather lame duck at this point.
Awww.......Bush failed.



VOTE GREEN PARTY FOR REAL POLITICAL REPRESENTATION! http://www.gp.org

Originally posted by: Abaques
If Snake and Cimat agree on something then I think its case closed.
Good, I hope they keep overriding the fucker too.
Looks like the checks and balences in the system are working just fine.
Originally posted by: cimat1984
Awww.......Bush failed.



Theres a news flash.
This was a well compromised bill written nearly as much by the republicans as the Dems. The way things used to work before the Newt radicalization project. Lets hope it is a sign of things to come. And if hillary gets the election, it will be deja vue all over again!
Post edited by Bunks at 11/8/2007 1:05:12 PM
Wow, you finally got him! BRAVO!
Originally posted by: Cocytus
Wow, you finally got him! BRAVO!


Nope, he has been getting himself since day one. The epitome of give him enough rope....
Originally posted by: DieselFuel!
Originally posted by: Cocytus
Wow, you finally got him! BRAVO!


Nope, he has been getting himself since day one. The epitome of give him enough rope....


Keep the dream alive brother! AMEN!

(Never did get that impeachement) Opps!
i came home just in time to hear the final vote being read on cspan-2


Originally posted by: Cocytus


(Never did get that impeachement) Opps!


Who was supposed to?

I was referring to the fact that he has managed to dissapoint nearly 4 out of every 5 citizens of this country in one way or another. That can't be easy!
Bush missed the bus trying to convince people hes a fiscal conservative after passing every spending bill ever brought up in the Republican controlled congress which were responsible for a MASSIVE number of pork barrel projects.
just ask a celebrity why bush tried to veto this bill

cause he dont like black people
Originally posted by: r3dnekk
just ask a celebrity why bush tried to veto this bill

cause he dont like black people


Originally posted by: Polaroid
Huh?
Originally posted by: Coba|t
Bush missed the bus trying to convince people hes a fiscal conservative after passing every spending bill ever brought up in the Republican controlled congress which were responsible for a MASSIVE number of pork barrel projects.

Agreed, and I give him no credit on this one.

Nevertheless, I have to agree with my man Russ that this was one screwed up bill. One version was 14 billion, one was 15 billion, and they got together in conference and somehow it became 23 billion. That's indicative of an inherently corrupt process and it would be nice if Bush had any credibility at all as a fiscal conservative because then he might have been able to stop this abortion of a bill.
Bush is still President?

Originally posted by: [-NM-] SPACEHERPES
Bush is still President?




time's a ticking though....he's only there in spirit..

.

Originally posted by: Bunks
This was a well compromised bill written nearly as much by the republicans as the Dems. The way things used to work before the Newt radicalization project. Lets hope it is a sign of things to come.
BS. When Democrats owned the House and Senate in the 70's & 80's, they didn't give Republicans the time of day. And for the most part, they're back at it already.
___________________________________________
"My answer is to burn all the fucking oil as quick as possible and then the politicians will have to find a solution.” - R.D.
Originally posted by: Coba|t

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The Senate on Thursday handed President Bush his first veto override -- authorizing $23 billion in new water projects.

The Senate voted to pass the bill 79-14, despite the president's objections.

Supporters said the projects authorized under the Water Resources Development Act are necessary to rebuild the Gulf Coast after the devastation of Hurricane Katrina, restore the Everglades and Great Lakes fisheries and build flood-control projects nationwide.
...
No senator spoke in favor of sustaining Bush's veto during Wednesday afternoon's debate. The bill has had overwhelming support on both sides of the aisle, said Sen. Mary Landrieu, D-Louisiana.

"I don't know why the president chose this bill to try to reassume the mantle of fiscal responsibility, but he picked the wrong bill," she said.

The measure will fund projects including the reconstruction of levees around New Orleans, Louisiana, and the closure of the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet -- a man-made channel blamed for funneling Katrina's storm surge into the city's Lower 9th Ward and neighboring St. Bernard Parish.
...
"Frankly, without it, our long-term recovery is really in jeopardy," she said.

In his veto message, Bush complained that Congress added about $8 billion in projects to the bill in conference committee after each house had passed its own version.

"American taxpayers should not be asked to support a pork-barrel system of federal authorization and funding where a project's merit is an afterthought," he said.

But supporters say the projects are necessary because Congress has gone more than seven years since its last major water resources bill passed.

Since the 2006 elections, Bush has vetoed three spending bills -- the water bill, a $35 billion expansion of the state-run, federally funded Children's Health Insurance Program and a $120 billion war-spending bill that would have called for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq in 2008.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/08/congress.water/index.html

It seems to me that Bush is trying to stone-wall congress, attempting to limit their power of the purse at the most inappropriate times.

Seems like he is a rather lame duck at this point.


since when is it the federal governments job to take such actions?
_______________________
Originally posted by: the wierdo
There's nothing like a little child molestation to bring people together and rise above the partisanship
Originally posted by: Pudd¿nheäd
ive been wanting coq for some time now, and im goin for it on sunday!
Originally posted by: Aria Giovanni.pZ
kok. i want kok. lots of kok.
Originally posted by: ~~Snake~~
Looks like the checks and balences in the system are working just fine.

im sure it was in no way whatsoever related to the upcoming elections and senators trying to distance themselves from him.
Originally posted by: cimat1984
Awww.......Bush failed.



Seeing as the government PAID to "beef up and repair" levees about a dozen different occasions over nearly a decade...and the money went elsewhere to do things that had nothing to do with levees...why is there such a need to place it at Bush's feet? What about the money Clinton authorized for the same levees? Where did the money go? It sure as hell didn't go into levees. (and no..I'm not saying that Clinton stole the money or whatever; but what did Lousiana do with all of that money earmarked for levee construction and water/flood plain control? It sure as hell didn't go into the levees).


TWL|Lord Skeletor
TeamWarfare Competition Staff
Email: Skeletor@teamwarfare.com
IRC: #teamwarfare, #twl_GRAW, #twl_rvs

21 posts recovered