Voting and 8v8 > 7v7 > 6v6

First off.. would it be possible to get an offical TWL poll
to vote.. 1 vote per team

Second off.. something I forgot to mention.. in TFC league possibly http://tfc.sta-league.org they had this whole player dispute.. default was 9v9 they wanted 8v8..

solution.. ever tied round you drop a player..

AB 8v8 if TIED BA = 7v7 if TIED AB = 6v6 if TIED BA = 4v4

no

ahh ...... NO

I'd like to see 1v1 on battery

Would have been nice it there was a vote from the start before the Pre-Season games.
http://www.naked-warriors.com

Knuckles,

There is a small problem with that approach. In order to make any vote "fair", it'd have to be put to the team founders only. In order for that to happen, teams will need to be registered. A vote open to all the public would never work since the voting is set up to be account based. People could just create a number of new accounts and "stuff the ballot box" so to speak.

While I'm not an ET admin, I can safely say they're listening to the what the public is saying. Pre-season is just that, an opportunity to see what's working and what isn't so that all the major issues are resolved prior to the regular season. Just have a little faith, and let's see what happens.

Thanks for the response.

Originally posted by: Rahl_SoT
Knuckles,

There is a small problem with that approach. In order to make any vote "fair", it'd have to be put to the team founders only. In order for that to happen, teams will need to be registered. A vote open to all the public would never work since the voting is set up to be account based. People could just create a number of new accounts and "stuff the ballot box" so to speak.

While I'm not an ET admin, I can safely say they're listening to the what the public is saying. Pre-season is just that, an opportunity to see what's working and what isn't so that all the major issues are resolved prior to the regular season. Just have a little faith, and let's see what happens.

wow... 1 week on the job and Rahl is catching on to the small details. GG bro

I understand and can appreciate the thought behind the 6 vs 6 and 7 vs 7 is to cut down spam in game. I would like to offer another idea that being class limitation. All too often team will resort to all panzer all medic all lt tactics. While these are valid tactic it makes the game less than fun and generates tons of spam in cretin instances. well this is what I came up with and think what you like.

One lt per three other classes
One medic per three other classes
One engineer per one other class
Heavy weapons two of any type per team
Covert ops two per team

If teams were made up of 8

2 LTs
2 medics
2 engineers
1 heavy weapon
1 covert ops

or

2 LTs
2 medics
3 engineers
1 covert ops

or

2 LTs
2 medics
3 engineers
1 heavy weapon

or

2 LTs
2 Medics
2 engineers
2 panzers, mortars, mg42, flame thowers

or

2 LTs
2 medics
2 engineers
2 covert ops

and many other combinations.

this is just an idea and like i said think what you like..
Post edited by LoT-Noir at 7/31/2003 7:45:16 PM

Originally posted by: Sheffra
I'd like to see 1v1 on battery

Do you ever make a comment that isn't irrelevant?

I think 6 vs 6 is fine for the league. Makes it more important what classes you choose, and what you defend.
Post edited by [rD]MrBlond at 8/5/2003 1:43:20 PM

Originally posted by: LoT-Noir
I understand and can appreciate the thought behind the 6 vs 6 and 7 vs 7 is to cut down spam in game.

*detailed stuff cut for space *

it'd be a pain to enforce though you'd just have lots of clans bitching every 10 seconds with stuff like "OMG THEY RAN TOO MANY LTS SHOW DEMOS!!!!"
Post edited by apathy` at 8/5/2003 1:47:35 PM

---------------

() apathy

Rotators - #rotators / gnet