3.2 cfg??

Are we supposed to use antiwarp now? What about subbing is that allowed now??

Kinda going on the fly here, but I don't think we should use antiwarp due to some of the issues with it. Perhaps in the next release if these issues are all ironed out or if after some more testing we decide to go ahead with it sure, but as of now, I'd prefer not to use it. If both teams agree to use it beforehand, then I don't really have a problem with it, but there will be zero tolerance toward any disputes arising from it or in any way related to antiwarp.

Subbing: I have no problem with allowing subs, as long as the sub goes into /sub mode somewhere out of the way to prevent any potential problems with his "invisible corpse." Subs are also responsible for recording demos, and their demo can and will be asked for in the event of a dispute that requires demos to be viewed.


Like I said, I'm making these two rulings on the fly, considering the fact that the matches will be starting in a few short hours. These may change for next week after we get some feedback on 3.2 from the matches this week.

Good decision. The antiwarp is experimental right now anyway. We tried it on our server one night, and it affected many people. All it takes is a few hickups with the server causing everybody to have an unstable ping for periods of time. I think there's too many malicious things that could possibly be bad with the antiwarp. Say a team is very malicious and gets all teh ips for the opponent, then has another member or a couple members just ping flood the piss out of em. I can see many teams leaving OGL as they are instating the antiwarp in the required connfigs.
Post edited by [CiC]RichardNixon at 1/22/2004 9:35:30 PM

Subbing: I have no problem with allowing subs, as long as the sub goes into /sub mode somewhere out of the way to prevent any potential problems with his "invisible corpse." Subs are also responsible for recording demos, and their demo can and will be asked for in the event of a dispute that requires demos to be viewed.

Using your sub to ferret out the location of an enemy flag carrier is okay? Please a straight yes or no.

Uh, no? A sub can only spectate his team last I checked...

With strictfollow 1 or whatever, which is obviously intended lol

Yes, g_followstrict 1, which is in the config, only allows the sub to follow the team he's on. Have any of you tried subbing in ctf, trust me, you cannot watch for too long anyway, when the person you are following dies, you immediately switch to somebody else and it's quick. So if you're a team that dies a lot, like us, it can be very nausiating. If you want to send a guy to ferret out the flag or other team, you can do what p2 did agianst us and have one guy change teams and tk 3 of us.

Rofl, p2 wtf!

Originally posted by: Low Ki
Subbing: I have no problem with allowing subs, as long as the sub goes into /sub mode somewhere out of the way to prevent any potential problems with his "invisible corpse."

I thought the invisible solid guys thing was fixed in 3.2?

good decission, I'm gald TWL is allowing subs

Originally posted by: BludShoT

Originally posted by: Low Ki
Subbing: I have no problem with allowing subs, as long as the sub goes into /sub mode somewhere out of the way to prevent any potential problems with his "invisible corpse."

I thought the invisible solid guys thing was fixed in 3.2?

Supposedly, yes. Which is why I said "potential problems" cuz ya just never know.

Can we get that 3.2 cfg?

Why do we need a new cfg? I didn't think we were changing anything.

antiwarp??? no antiwarp? wtf is going on ..

/me votes no. It's not competition ready IMO. Even the readme file that comes with 3.2 says:
- It's turned off by default as it's still fairly experimental

Originally posted by: BludShoT
antiwarp??? no antiwarp? wtf is going on ..

Antiwarp will not be used in its current state.