Yes all purger lost his testicle in a BIKING ACCIDENT, he is getting a metal one. We were talking and this question came up, if u lose ur right testicle can u still call ur other one ur left? somebody plz help me answewr i say no.
Crazy WOPs. Man, it should be called the Central Testicle! But you know, only people that have papers to prove themselves should be allowed to know this.jk
Well.............
if there is only one of something then you do not need to use an adjective to describe the object, that would be redundant... E.g.
- If you only have 1 computer monitor, but had 2 at one point, you wouldnt still describe the remaining monitor to someone as the right or left one, it then becomes "MY monitor"
- If you lost your left arm, and got an itch on it, you wouldnt go over to someone and say "would you please scratch my right arm?", it then becomes "MY arm"
- you are out with a friend and 2 woman are standing out front of an ice cream shop, if you wanted to point out the fat one, you would say "look at the fat chick", but once the thin one leaves all you are left with is "look at the chick" that was once know as the fat chick, shes still fat, but it would be redundant to point out what is obvious.
So by that line of reasoning your remaining testicle, once known as the/my left testicle, ceases to exist and is forever now known as THE/MY testicle.
Hope that clears it up for ya =)
Xeon u are the master of the english language , on the real sh!t ..when i read your comment i was like WOW WOW WOW nice example to understand ....is this guy a english teacher or what ? anyways Xeon i kneel to the ground as i ask to be your apprentice to spend time with u and learn the trade of knowledge u have master xeon !
You put forth some valid points Xeon, but let me play devil's advocate for a moment...
In your examples, you point out that it would be redundant to add unnecessary adjectives which describe objects which are plainly in view, and I would agree with you. If a man with one arm approached me and asked me to scratch said arm, I would not need "right" or "left" to know which arm he wants scratched.
However, with objects which are not in view, you run into some problems. For example...
If I had lung surgery and my right lung was removed, and then six months later I got really depressed because I couldn't run a mile anymore without passing out or something, and for some freaky reason I had a friend help me kill myself by stabbing me in the lung, I would say "Stab me in the left lung, Bob," because if I just said "Stab me in the lung," there might be some confusion as to which side of my body the lung in question actually was.
In this case adding the "left" or "right" modifier can be considered appropriate, as it describes location rather than distinguishing from a pair.
Otherwise you're trying to say, "Stab me in the lung, Bob, the one on the left side of my chest," which is way to much for a man with one lung to say with one breath, prolonging your tortured existence several more seconds than necessary.
I think the "left" and "right" modifiers will be especially useful in the future for Purger once he has his new artificial testicle, because while he has only one true nut, to tell his girlfriend to "Suck my nut," is not enough info.
(As a side note, if I was out at an ice cream shop and wanted to point out "the fat chick" even though her friend was gone, I would most likely still say "look at the fat chick." Our society in general tends to add the descriptor "fat" to overweight people despite the fact that they are obviously overweight; "thin" people use the word "fat" as a social separator, a characteristic that makes a person fall into a different class.
Generally, thin people like to point out that fat people are fat to re-affirm their superior social status to themselves and others; this is not the only separator we use. While individuals have all sorts of characteristics that we COULD use to describe them, white America generally focuses on the characteristics that are least socially or physically desirable... "Look at the (crippled guy, fat kid, flat chick, black/asian/latino/ guy, etc.)
Think about this the next time you point someone out it public; most of the time the ONLY reason we point someone out in public is to make fun of them for being different in some way, thus elevating our social group.)
While I'm writing this novel, let me take a second to say that I'm getting pretty damn sick of people using racial and religious slurrs during play.
***Calling someone a Jew or a Nigger is NOT appropriate***
I admit, I'm guilty of calling people "fag" in the heat of the moment, but it's not because I have any hate toward homosexuals; if I have offended someone who is homosexual during play, let me take this opportunity to appologize. The difference is, I'm not consciously using the term to deride homosexuals; "fag" is just a general term for me meaning "stupid, irritating, annoying, etc".
I see people using Nigger and Jew intentionally all the time, and it pisses me off. I think I'm going to start TKing anyone I see being an idiot like that.
Well.............
if there is only one of something then you do not need to use an adjective to describe the object, that would be redundant... E.g.
- If you only have 1 computer monitor, but had 2 at one point, you wouldnt still describe the remaining monitor to someone as the right or left one, it then becomes "MY monitor"
- If you lost your left arm, and got an itch on it, you wouldnt go over to someone and say "would you please scratch my right arm?", it then becomes "MY arm"
- you are out with a friend and 2 woman are standing out front of an ice cream shop, if you wanted to point out the fat one, you would say "look at the fat chick", but once the thin one leaves all you are left with is "look at the chick" that was once know as the fat chick, shes still fat, but it would be redundant to point out what is obvious.
So by that line of reasoning your remaining testicle, once known as the/my left testicle, ceases to exist and is forever now known as THE/MY testicle.
Hope that clears it up for ya =)
you need to get out more buddy!!! or atleast start drinking.
The difference is, I'm not consciously using the term to deride homosexuals; "fag" is just a general term for me meaning "stupid, irritating, annoying, etc".
And why is that fag has become a general term for you...why is it that fag means stupid, irritating, annoying...so you find homosexual people to be this way...I would guess that the majority of homosexuals out there are not irritating, stupid, annoying...and I would further say that there are more hetrosexual people out there that are that way...so why not call them hetro...because no one would think that is an insult...why? you mean to tell them that they are irritating, annoying, stupid....yet they don't make the connection...well that is because they are not insulted by the stupid, annoying, irritating meaning of "fag" they are insulted by the man on man action implications of the word...so when you are calling someone a fag you are insulting their sexuallity and not their character...which makes you a homophobe and a gay basher... and I think that is just hetro
Metal nuts are kewl. Someone tryes 2 kick u in da nuts and u go like, "I vill hit u buck wit me metall balls! (shwatzniger accent)". sounds about right .
Xeon i kneel to the ground as i ask to be your apprentice to spend time with u and learn the trade of knowledge u have master xeon !
Hmmm...sounds like milko is ready to bust out the knee pads...I'd be careful xeon "ONCE AN ASSHAT ALWAYS AN ASSHAT"
Currently attending a 12 step Flame-Rehabilitation program and weekly sessions of F.A.A. (Flame Addicts Anonymous)
You missed the whole thing about the artificial nut. According to your "my nut," theory, his artificial nut is non-existent. You need to have right or left there, and real or fake, otherwise, Milko's sucking the wrong nut, and you won't feel a thing.
Thus, you need to differentiate. Sorry, Milko, looks like you're kneeling down in front of the wrong guy. Don't get any ideas, I'm homophobic!!!
This isn't necessarily a joke as someone suggested. I had a college roomate who got kicked in the nuts while playing hackey sack. He had to have it removed eventually due to massive swelling. They did not provide an artificial one however.
One of them was a guy I went to school with who was so annoying that he got kicked in the nuts ALL the time, so much so that one day someone snapped a towel at him in the locker room which actually split his damn nut sac. He is sterile because of all the abuse his balls took over the years, and the towel incident left him with only one testicle (I shit you not, my friends, I shit you not).
The other guy lost one to testicular cancer.
I know it's serious and all, but sweet Jesus, losing a nut playing hacky sac? Wow... just, wow.
The only guy I can think of that actually deserved to lose a nut was Tom Green, that was God striking him down right there for being such a jerk.
yeah
Tom Green kicks ass at skateboarding
and embarassing me into laughter
oh and i know a guy with one nut also
his last name is Tut so after that fateful day
he has been known as One Nut Tut
but he still gets pussy so i guess it really doesnt matter Post edited by Cauldron at 2/7/2003 3:14:00 PM