Back to Tribes: Vengeance

Did single player take away from T:V sales?

Historical capture recovered from the Wayback Machine · captured 2005-01-23 · 15 posts
Just something I was thinking about.
Post edited by Vexorg at 12/13/2004 7:46:59 AM
i personally doubt it. seems like more ppl playing/played SP than MP.


however, i for one havent even beaten SP yet, so... (maybe thats why i suck so bad)
The SP is what most people think they actually did right with this game. It far exceeded my expectations.
Originally posted by: C53421
The SP is what most people think they actually did right with this game. It far exceeded my expectations.


supposedly they used an exorbitant amount of their budget on SP is why... had next to nothing to work MP with. that's the buzz a month or so ago, anywho.
They had an extremely small budget to work with compared to other games like Half Life 2, Doom 3, Halo 2, etc. I don't think the allocation of funds was too heavy to either part of the game but the lack of funds in general made it much more difficult to create a polished game worthy of release.
yes, probably, maybe, maybe not, not really, no
i dont know
Single player rocked.
Post edited by Ben-Dover at 12/13/2004 3:17:35 PM
best SP of any Tribes game thats for sure.
I was thinking some people maybe tried SP and did not like it, therefore they never gave online playing (and the community) a chance.
TV has a single player?
i thought it was extremely fun especially for a tribes vet
gonna test out teh siggy here. sorry.


T2 single player was better
ummm, how could it take away from sales? i dont even understand how that is possible...

it can only looks good, and it was a great SP that really surprised me with its strengths


Raindance:Vengeance 1.0
FFs Geiss. Did you really have to make it that large?

(¯`·.¸.:| Aurora (retired) - respect is given to those that form their own opinions - Val |:.¸.·´¯)

15 posts recovered