OK... now that I have you in my grasp on the 2 clans V 2Clans thred give me some maps you would like to play. I would say best 2 out of 3 blh blh, just like TWL But the maps would need to have considerable size.. about like archi. but possibly bigger.. Think about it 1 clan could just load up in gunships and move in to attack, so size in this case does matter....
But there are so many good maps, we should make a pool of the best ones and randomly pick 3. Otherwise it wouldn't be fair to an extent. Post edited by Firepower_aoa at 5/23/2003 1:44:28 AM
i think we need maps that are larger, but are not a lag fest. I think you could acutally play harvester? its base could be defended finally!!!
Air support 2 would be win! would encoirge havocs full of HO's!
some of the Euromaps ( hosted here on twl) are great! they would pose an interesting change, to the boredom of the already overplayed map lists out there. Post edited by Cpl. of Tribes at 5/23/2003 11:13:35 AM
Archipelago - 1337 routes and passes = teamwaork = more fun.
Insalubrius - same thing as above.
Bolder Dash - same thing as above
Death Birds Fly - Would Be Fun! Bases 1600m apart
StoneHenge - ubar Dets.
Some of the 64 player maps that Grifter09 and Dogdrooler Put together.
ok here's what well do once the teams get put together i'll have 1 team chose 10 maps and the opposeing team chose 10. there BOUND to chose 3 of the same.... and they will play those....
Thats what would make it interesting, because it would not be a rape fest.
think about it.
2 vpads
3 spots for gens
great distance
Spam would be minimal because the flag is in house.
I agree the score would be low,
But i think that map can give squad like play.
meaning
5 borg on a transport
4 snipers in ceptors and wraiths
2 cappers
teleporting
tank battles
air battles in ceptor
Inhouse defense
outside defense
That map covers every aspect of the game.
also lets not forget that the lag and fps either.
bigger maps= better connection and fps because of less activity by spam, rape and constant respawn Post edited by Absolut3_Chaos at 5/25/2003 8:38:42 AM
I agree AC i think thin ice sucks ass usually, but in this case it would make for a really good choice. the distance, and all the resources a team could take advantage of would be really cool to see on a scale this big, with 10-12 players you could never use all the stuff in thin ice.....