Back to Tribes Renegades

Renegades 2.0 Minimum Team Size 10 or 12 ?

Historical capture recovered from the Wayback Machine · captured 2003-05-09 · 4 of 7 pages survived · 81 posts
This thread had 7 pages; 3 pages were never captured by the Wayback Machine — some replies are missing.
I have been asked several times recently to have the ladder minimum size moved from 10 to 12. It could still remain 12-16 but the minimum would be 12. I would like a general discussion on this topic keeping in mind I would to a founders vote not a general ladder vote. This means only founders of the team would cast the vote for or against. All votes need to pass with 60% of the ladder voting for the change before it would take effect.

^Kodiak

{Rk|Royal Knights
this was my idea. vote yes and ur cool.

12 is so much better... allows for more flexability stratigically and allows for more people on a roster to play

_____________________________________________________________


"...worst capper/LD ever..." ZProtoss
12, thanx
12.


Click here to add a soldier to my Dwarven army!
12... and can we get new mapz kthxz
Originally posted by: ^Kodiak

This means only founders of the team would cast the vote for or against.


n00bs

Lesser: "any place that flames agrippa can't be all bad"
10 until loh recruits more



12.


M.S.S. -- "We will welcome them with bullets and shoes."



Originally posted by: Dogdrooler

10 until loh recruits more


ur losing recruit now.

12 with a roster cap of 11!
I'm down. Let's have the vote. 12>10


12
10
it takes 60% and LoH is entitled to thier vote.


12 is fine by me when I know in advance. but i am not a founder per TWL.
Post edited by Cpl. of Tribes at 3/31/2003 11:31:21 AM
12.. please.. thanks
I think 12 is a great idea. Our funnest matches have been 14-16 peeps on each side anyway.
 
--Glanzer

17vs17 was the best.. 12 would make this ladder more fun, and imo needed.
Bagel says 12. :P
How soon would this go into effect? A couple of weeks ago when we had 14 showing to each match I would've been all for it, but we've recently lost quite a few people and would need some time to recruit to be able to consistently field 12 again..

12
12
where do we actually vote on this?

Voite for Founders of teams only should be up by tonight I think.


^Kodiak

{Rk|Royal Knights
Originally posted by: ^Kodiak

Voite for Founders of teams only should be up by tonight I think.



GOOD LUCK FINDING ODECUTT.
technically could i drop from W, make a new clan and vote for 12?

autovote.cs

Add two teams to TWL ren ladder, one team Vote Ten, other team Vote Twelve

Who ever has more members in 24hrs wins. :-)


LoL..

go roster cap.
If you all go and make new teams Imma F u up and make this ladder a 5v5...


^Kodiak

{Rk|Royal Knights
make it 7 v 7 like the base & classic ladders. Or 14 v 14 like base & classic for consistency throughout t2
Do NOT click.
Barx has trouble getting 10 people to play in a match sometimes.

Looking at the ladder, I think if you want 12, play 12, if you want 10, play 10.. but to make it 12 would be silly if some of the clans can only field 10..

Let the ones that want to play 12 , play 12...

As far as a split, good luck..Ren is not that big right now, and Tribes as a whole is shrinking..
Originally posted by: SlickVision

Leave it at 10 if both teams can do 12, do 12. Small community.


if that's your logic, it should be like 3v3


M.S.S. -- "We will welcome them with bullets and shoes."



Originally posted by: -PimpDogg-

if that's your logic, it should be like 3v3


um, ok
Sorry If this has been said I'm lazy today and just read the first couple posts.

Shouldn't you guys get at least 20 teams on the ladder before thinking about uping the match size?
teams that can only field a few do that for three reasons:

1) leaders aren't tough enough to cut dead weight

2) too lazy to recruit

3) don't know how to recruit good talent, thus adding more dead weight: see #1

ok well here are the setbacks

10 player teams, not as much fun, but more teams and not as many forfeits

12 player teams, more fun, less teams, im sure it would happen

my vote will go to 10
10 vs 10 sucks... one of the reasons HK left........not saying 12 vs 12 would bring hk back...
Post edited by SMOKIESMOM at 4/3/2003 12:42:17 AM
Originally posted by: SMOKIESMOM

10 vs 10 sucks... one of the reasons HK left........not saying 12 vs 12 would bring hk back...

-
==
sq33k!

To enter the inner circle of Unix, my son, you must forget the three Rs of Microsoft: Retry, Reboot, Re-install.
==
-
Originally posted by: SMOKIESMOM

10 vs 10 sucks... one of the reasons HK left........not saying 12 vs 12 would bring hk back...


10 vs 10 does not suck, its just a lame reason for a team to leave if u ask me
As much as I hate to agree with SmokeDAWG 10v10 is teh uber lose. thnx.


Ok ... My Opinion on All this ... 12v12 Will Be More Fun for the Bigger.... Keyword ... 'Bigger' Clans ... But The New Upcoming Clans .. Might Not be Able to Field 10 Like a Bunch of Other People are Saying, and if we Want Ren to Stay Alive Longer and Get Bigger, We Need To Have The Newbies come in Here and Be Able to Start up a Clan and Get Recruits and Compete ... Altho 2 Members isn't Alot ... i Don't Kno, My Vote won't Count but i Just Wanted to Drop my Ops ...