Back to Counter Strike

Score Reporting

Historical capture recovered from the Wayback Machine · captured 2003-11-06 · 10 posts
What are the chances that we can make an additional rule to the 2v2 and 5v5 cs leagues? What i would like to suggest, is requiring the losing team to report the correct scores. I know that we can all make a mistake while reporting the scores, but making an intentional misreport of scores is 1. Just plain Childish 2. in any competive league, everyone likes to review scores and see the final results. 3. Helps teams find strengths and weeknesses of the other teams in the league. An example of utter childish score reporting is this : Dust: 20024 - 46, Prodigy: 1998 - 56, Train: 0 - 1337. An example of good score reporting, which just happens to be the correct scores of "Special Ops Chicago"'s victory over "The Cincinnati Elite" for 1st place is: Dust 13-6, Prodigy 13-7. Oh, and we can all thank "Cincinnati Elite" for providing us with the example of "childish score reporting". Ty. GG, and remember, cal-0 > cal-im.
Post edited by {SOC}Gimli at 9/14/2003 10:56:59 PM
mwt !
i agree with gimi
yea a 1-2 cal-o team > 2-5 (one forfit win) cal-im team, personally it looks like SOC will stay in cal-o and looks like ce SHOULD have stayed there
naaa were just getting started in this!
The smart thing to do would be make it so winner reports. When you have loser report you get angry and sore losers who either report wrong and dont report at all and just hold you up on the ladder forever.
exactly
On the other hand, having the winner report could be worst. It might make the losing team report quicker and say that THEY were the winners instead of the team that actually won. Which means more time spent on reviewing demos, scores, etc.
If that happened all it would take is showing an admin screenshots of the scores, not exactly hard. Especially if reporting a win when you didnt actually win came with severe consequenses.
good point dingo

(a dingo ate my baby )

10 posts recovered