Back to UT2003

WTF WILL G3TI500...

Historical capture recovered from the Wayback Machine · captured 2002-09-06 · 1 of 2 pages survived · 21 posts
This thread had 2 pages; 1 page was never captured by the Wayback Machine — some replies are missing.
play UT2K3 well?
anyone know details on this?
depends on what kind of CPU you are running.
______

=V= DarkJedi
ath xp 2000
plays fine on mine.
-----
I cap about 60 FPS sec with full details and sounds with my GF3 DDR64...

Yes the leaked version, but if this leaks works well am sure the final will rule
oh yes, CPU power is needed!

I have: P4 1.6 MHZ FSB: 400 with Rambus 800 MHZ
that helps alot
Veor, only you would be dumb enough to acknowledge using the warez version of UT2k3 on public TWL forums.


Skacore
Teamwarfare UT2003 Ladder Admin
Skacore, don't worrie if you follow the Official UT2K3 Forum, you will notice that it's almost a good help for them.

My story is different on the leaked version because it's actually my job to test games

YES! paid to play hahahahahah!
i have a:
- GF4 ti4400
- AMD Athlon T-bird 1.4 GHZ
- 384 SDR

i think ut2003 will run fine-good on my system. what ya guys think?

____________

=(ir)=Fiber
ONly depends now how you set your game. But you should run ok!

Even a 2GHZ with a TI4600 can't handle the game at 120FPS
well, put it like this....the GF3Ti500 out performs the GF4's all except the 4600 and the new 128mb 4200.
True!

In the top ranks its

GF4:4600
GF4:4200 128
GF3:TI500
GF3DR
GF4: don't remember lol
GF3:TI200

http://www.anandtech.com

Im running a AMD 2000+ XP @ 1850MHz with 512mb of Corsair cas2 pc3000, 60G HD, and a GeForce2 GTS..will i be able to run it?
|C|-DoctoR WanG

http://www.teamcaustic.com
#caustic
GF2 will maybe rush man

That will be important ot upgrade I guess... but look at the bright side

You will be able to play DOOM 3 too
uhh, legende, comkill.............i dont know what article youre reading. the only place that ANY GF3 beats the slowest *real* GF4(the 4200) is in the memory bandwidth test. the 4200 creams the GF3's in game.
Mark Rein said in a recent IRC chat that he plays the game "well" at his home computer which is a P3 @ 800Mhz and a GeForce 2 GTS. I'm certain we'll all be able to whoop some in some degree.
GF3 beats the hell out of the GF4MX
GF3DDR and GF3TI500 are almost as strong as the GF4TI4200 but the 4200 still beat the TI500 and ddr.
Just do a benchmark on those cards, you will see


So the I don't remember was MX!
And for a better fact, I use Anandtech that can be used for a good refference. Am not sure that UT2K3 will be fun on a P3800, GF2... I will have to test that one day, but I know even with my computer, the top details and all slower my machine, it's doesn't get jumpy.. only slower FPS drops to 30 or less... Now if your playing competitions 30 or less is REALLY BAD. ... humm again, it depends some people manage to like that

Oh by the way, don't count on CVAR tweaks in UT2K3. And yes, it's only the beta and leak version that I have, so it's possible the game will be much better since I have a version that's almost 2 months old and one that is 8 months old.
GF4 MX will handle ut2k3 fine.

Any high end GF2 card, like the ultra's or better, GTS may have trouble, but really any GF4 AGP 4x based card, any GF3...

Radeon 8500's can handle the game with incredibly easy too.
Am still basing my facts with 927 build
the game is 5 version better now, no leak or no NDA beta were released this time.
Based on the 927 build that I've played on a GeForce 2 MX, GeForce 3 Ti200, GeForce 3 Ti500, and GeForce 4 MX, I can tell you that you need AT LEAST a GeForce 3 Ti of some sort to be able to see all the visual effects.

On the GeForce 2 MX and GeForce 4 MX certain textures are messed up because the cards are not capable to producing some special effects.

You can still run the game but some textures and special effects won't work properly.

ManBeef, a GF4 MX will NOT run this game to its fullest extent, at least based on the build that I've played. There are screwed up textures.
Post edited by Creamy Goodness at 8/24/2002 1:30:50 PM
Creamy, It ran fine for me, was a higher end system, 2.2 ghz P4, 512 MB DDR, and GF4 MX.

It ran fine, I don't know about all the effects, not everyone plays a game for pretty effects, I turn them off the majority of the time just for a large FPS increase and I care about gameplay more than graphics

21 posts recovered